Question

How strong is the evidence for stem-cell therapy in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency?

ClinicalTrials.gov registrations alone cannot establish how strong the evidence is. Registry activity is active but still early, with limited late-phase registration: the registry holds 36 records, 11 completed, 3 at Phase 3 or 4, and 5 stopped early (14%). MSC-specific work accounts for 18 of those records. These counts describe research activity and maturity, not benefit, safety or certainty. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

What counts as a real result in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency

Only follicle development, ovulation, clinical pregnancy and live birth count, reported against the concurrent IVF protocol. A rise in AMH or a resumed period in a condition with documented spontaneous fluctuation is not evidence of restored fertility.

What we can say from registrations alone

  • Volume: 36 registered studies since 2002.
  • Maturity: 3 confirmatory-phase records.
  • Delivery: 11 completed; 5 terminated, withdrawn or suspended.
  • Scale: median planned enrolment 40 participants, largest 320.

The completed studies

Completed does not mean published, and published does not mean positive. These are the finished records — the starting point for checking whether results ever appeared.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT02372474 — "It is a Real" The First Baby Of Autologous Stem Cell Therapy in Premature Ovarian FailurePhase 1, Phase 2Completed112Al-Azhar University2012-03
NCT04675970 — Long Term Follow up Patients With Premature Ovarian Failure ex Vivo Gene Therapyn/aCompleted86Ukraine Association of Biobank2020-09-01
NCT00429494 — GnRH Analogue for Ovarian Function Preservation in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation PatientsPhase 2Completed60M.D. Anderson Cancer Center2002-11
NCT07048730 — Gynecological Impact of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adultsn/aCompleted51University Hospital, Bordeaux2025-09-19
NCT04475744 — 4-step ASCOT in POI Women to Promote Follicular RescuePhase 3Completed42Fundación IVI2021-03-05
NCT02644447 — Transplantation of HUC-MSCs With Injectable Collagen Scaffold for POFPhase 1, Phase 2Completed23Chinese Academy of Sciences2015-10

What registrations cannot tell you

Whether results were positive. Whether they were published at all — a large share of registered studies never report outcomes, which biases what the literature appears to show. And whether the product a commercial clinic sells resembles the product studied: cell source, dose, processing and delivery route vary enormously between a registered protocol and an off-protocol injection.

How to use this when someone is selling you a treatment

Ask which specific registered study supports the offer, then compare its intervention description with your quote. If the answer is a general gesture at "Premature Ovarian Insufficiency research", you are being sold the field's activity rather than evidence about the product. The Provider Question Builder turns that gap into questions.

Frequently asked

How strong is the evidence for stem-cell therapy in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency?

ClinicalTrials.gov registrations alone cannot establish how strong the evidence is. Registry activity is active but still early, with limited late-phase registration: 36 registered records, 3 at Phase 3/4 and 5 stopped early (2026-08-29).

Has any stem-cell product been approved for this condition?

Look it up at source: regulators publish authorised products and indications. Registration of a trial, a licence to operate a clinic and product approval are three different things.

Why do clinics cite hundreds of studies?

Because counting registrations is easy and sounds authoritative. The number that matters is how many controlled studies reported a clinically meaningful outcome for the product being sold.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads