Comparison

MSC vs HSCT for Crohn's & IBD: what the registries show

For Crohn's & IBD, the registry holds 52 MSC records against 18 HSCT records. MSC carries the larger research programme; neither column is a head-to-head efficacy result. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Side by side

MetricMSCHSCT
Registered studies5218
Recruiting now65
Phase 3 or 4 records41
Completed130
Stopped early1810
Countries with sites1710
Median planned enrolment2020
First registration year2,0062,001

The condition underneath the comparison

Crohn's disease is transmural intestinal inflammation with a relapsing course. Two very different cell propositions exist: local injection for perianal fistulas, which has the strongest regulatory footing in the whole field, and systemic infusion for luminal disease, which does not. Conflating them is how weak offers borrow credibility from strong evidence.

MSC: what it is

Mesenchymal stromal cells are the workhorse of commercial cell therapy: easy to source from fat, cord or marrow, easy to expand, and rarely characterised in the same way twice. Their proposed action is paracrine — signalling molecules that damp inflammation — rather than replacement of lost tissue. That matters when reading counts like these, because two studies filed under the same label can test materially different products at different doses by different routes.

HSCT: what it is

Haematopoietic transplantation is the oldest and most consequential cell therapy in medicine, with conditioning regimens that carry real mortality risk alongside genuine disease-modifying power. Registrations under this label therefore mix decades-old standard-of-care protocols with newer autoimmune-reset trials, and the risk profile is nothing like that of an outpatient infusion.

Maturity difference

MSC has 4 Phase 3/4 records and 13 completed studies; HSCT has 1 and 0. Where both sit early on the ladder, the honest answer to "which works better" is that registrations cannot tell you.

Leading MSC studies

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT07077746 — HB-adMSCs for the Treatment of Crohn's DiseasePhase 2Recruiting46Hope Biosciences Research Foundation2026-07-14
NCT06918808 — DB-3Q bmMSC-EVs in Patients With Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's DiseasePhase 2Recruiting36Direct Biologics, LLC2025-05-19
NCT03901235 — MSC Intratissular Injection in Crohn Disease PatientsPhase 1, Phase 2Recruiting60University of Liege2018-01-15
NCT05039411 — Safety of Allogeneic Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells (UC-MSCs) to Treat Perianal Fistulas w/ Crohn's DiseasePhase 1Recruiting5CryoCord Sdn Bhd2022-03-01
NCT05974280 — Study on the Treatment of Anal Fistulas Using Alofisel Versus Fat Autologous Stem Cellsn/aRecruiting20Nantes University Hospital2024-01-02

Leading HSCT studies

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT04224558 — Stem Cell Transplantation in Crohn's DiseasePhase 1, Phase 2Recruiting15Cedars-Sinai Medical Center2019-11-15
NCT03219359 — Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Crohn's DiseasePhase 2Recruiting50Aaron Etra2018-02-22
NCT01962415 — Reduced Intensity Conditioning for Non-Malignant Disorders Undergoing UCBT, BMT or PBSCTPhase 2Recruiting100Paul Szabolcs2014-02-04
NCT00692939 — Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Crohn's DiseasePhase 1, Phase 2Recruiting20Paul Szabolcs2012-06-26
NCT04528355 — Data Collection Study of Patients With Non-Malignant Disorders Undergoing UCBT, BMT or PBSCT With RICn/aRecruiting50Paul Szabolcs2020-08-20

The honest comparison

Head-to-head trials putting these two approaches in the same protocol are rare or absent for most conditions. Comparing counts from separate registry queries shows where research effort went — driven by cost, regulation and sponsor interest as much as by biology. Anyone presenting one column of this table as proof of superiority is overreading it.

Frequently asked

Is MSC better than HSCT for Crohn's & IBD?

The registries cannot answer that. They show research volume and maturity, not comparative effectiveness: 52 vs 18 registered records (2026-08-29).

Which has more late-stage research for Crohn's & IBD?

MSC: 4 Phase 3/4 records. HSCT: 1.

Can a clinic offer both?

Some do, which is itself worth questioning — a provider offering every modality for every condition is describing a business model, not a treatment rationale.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads