Evidence hub

Intellectual Disability: cell-therapy evidence by therapy class

Across every stem-cell intervention, ClinicalTrials.gov holds 27 registered records for Intellectual Disability — 2 recruiting, 4 at Phase 3 or 4, in 12 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

The condition, and why cells are proposed

Intellectual disability is an umbrella covering many distinct genetic and acquired causes, which is why aggregate registry counts here are close to meaningless without knowing the underlying diagnosis. Cell approaches address none of the genetic causes directly; the rationale, where stated, is neuroinflammatory or trophic support.

Therapy classes side by side

Therapy classRegisteredRecruitingPhase 3/4Countries
MSC0000
HSCT172211
exosomes0000
PRP0000

Counts come from separate registry queries per class; a study testing two interventions can appear in more than one row, so rows do not sum to the all-interventions total.

Geography of the research

United States accounts for about 38% of country mentions among sampled studies; 12 countries host at least one site.

CountryStudies with a site there
United States18
France6
United Kingdom5
Germany4
Italy4
Argentina3
Netherlands3
India2

The largest registered studies

Sorted by planned enrolment — size is not quality, but a 300-participant trial can answer questions a 12-participant series cannot.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT04090268 — Precision Exercise in Children With Malignant Hemopathiesn/aUnknown380University of Milano Bicocca2017-04-03
NCT04122742 — Diagnosis of RSTS: Identification of the Acetylation Profiles as Epigenetic Markers for Assessing Causality of CREBBP and EP300 Variants.n/aUnknown154University Hospital, Bordeaux2019-10-08
NCT02171104 — MT2013-31: Allo HCT for Metabolic Disorders and Severe OsteopetrosisPhase 2Active Not Recruiting149Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota2014-07-10
NCT00176904 — Stem Cell Transplant for Inborn Errors of MetabolismPhase 2, Phase 3Completed135Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota1995-01
NCT01962415 — Reduced Intensity Conditioning for Non-Malignant Disorders Undergoing UCBT, BMT or PBSCTPhase 2Recruiting100Paul Szabolcs2014-02-04
NCT02698579 — Long-term Follow-up of Participants With Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy Who Were Treated With Lenti-D Drug Productn/aActive Not Recruiting64Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc.2016-01-22

Most recently registered

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT07537374 — A Case-Control Observational Study of Peripheral Blood-Derived iPSC Models to Investigate Oligodendrocyte Lineage Development in Children With Williamn/aNot Yet Recruitingn/aQilu Hospital of Shandong University2026-04-01
NCT05665166 — Gene Therapy With Modified Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cells for Patients With Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIn/aActive Not Recruitingn/aUniversity of Manchester2023-06-01
NCT04528355 — Data Collection Study of Patients With Non-Malignant Disorders Undergoing UCBT, BMT or PBSCT With RICn/aRecruitingn/aPaul Szabolcs2020-08-20
NCT04122742 — Diagnosis of RSTS: Identification of the Acetylation Profiles as Epigenetic Markers for Assessing Causality of CREBBP and EP300 Variants.n/aUnknownn/aUniversity Hospital, Bordeaux2019-10-08
NCT03852498 — A Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD)n/aCompletedn/aGenetix Biotherapeutics Inc.2019-01-24

Reading this honestly

None of these numbers say the therapy works. They say how much organised research exists and how far along it is; effect sizes live in published results, not registry entries. For Intellectual Disability specifically, the practical question is which registered study — if any — matches the product a provider is offering, and what its outcome measures actually are.

Frequently asked

How many stem-cell trials exist for Intellectual Disability?

27 registered records mention a stem-cell intervention for this condition (2026-08-29 snapshot), of which 2 were recruiting.

Which therapy class is furthest along for Intellectual Disability?

Ranked by Phase 3/4 records: HSCT (2), MSC (0), exosomes (0), PRP (0).

Does a recruiting trial mean I can be treated?

No. Trials have eligibility criteria, and joining one is not the same as buying a treatment. Paying a clinic for an unproven intervention outside a registered study gives you neither the protections nor the data collection of a trial.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.