Journal

Where cell-therapy trials actually are, and where they are still recruiting

Registered studies cluster in a handful of conditions. We counted all 42 indications we track and separated the trials open to patients right now.

Clinics advertise cell therapy for almost anything. Trial registries show where the research effort genuinely sits, and the distribution is far narrower than the marketing.

Counts from ClinicalTrials.gov as of 2026-08-05. The dark bar is studies currently recruiting; the pale bar is everything registered.

Anaemia86Diabetes28Knee osteoarthritis15Heart failure10Stroke recovery13Multiple sclerosis14Primary immunodeficiency13Cirrhosis7Crohn disease / IBD14Chronic kidney disease9Parkinson disease15Spinal cord injury7
Registered and recruiting studies by condition. Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2, snapshot 2026-08-05.
ConditionRegistered studiesRecruiting nowRecruiting share
Anaemia5388616%
Diabetes2402812%
Knee osteoarthritis166159%
Heart failure125108%
Stroke recovery1101312%
Multiple sclerosis921415%
Primary immunodeficiency921314%
Cirrhosis8978%
Crohn disease / IBD891416%
Chronic kidney disease88910%
Parkinson disease701521%
Spinal cord injury70710%

Anaemia leads with 538 registered studies and 86 recruiting — largely haematology, the one area where cell therapy has been standard care for decades. Diabetes follows at 240.

The conditions promoted hardest to international patients sit much lower. Knee osteoarthritis has 166 registered studies with 15 recruiting. Multiple sclerosis has 92 and 14. Parkinson disease has 70 and 15.

A registered trial is not proof of benefit; it is proof that a question is being asked under a protocol. A recruiting trial is something more concrete — a documented route to receive the intervention with oversight, monitoring, and no charge for the experimental product.

The practical read

If a clinic offers a paid treatment for a condition with a dozen recruiting trials worldwide, the reasonable question is why the paid route is preferable to the monitored one. Sometimes there is a good answer — eligibility, geography, timing. Ask for it explicitly.

Build an itemised estimate with the cost worksheet. Online information cannot determine candidacy; verify any proposal with an independent qualified clinician.

Sources & further reading

Commercial price observations are heterogeneous and most cell-therapy uses remain investigational. Verify source scope, regulatory status and the proposed care with an independent qualified physician.

Compare cell-therapy evidence, registered studies and published price observations.

StemCellAtlas is a source-first research and cost-planning guide. It separates registry and regulator evidence from heterogeneous commercial observations.

Request written information