Question

How strong is the evidence for stem-cell therapy in Erectile Dysfunction?

ClinicalTrials.gov registrations alone cannot establish how strong the evidence is. Registry activity is active but still early, with limited late-phase registration: the registry holds 35 records, 12 completed, 2 at Phase 3 or 4, and 4 stopped early (11%). MSC-specific work accounts for 23 of those records. These counts describe research activity and maturity, not benefit, safety or certainty. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

What counts as a real result in Erectile Dysfunction

A credible result changes a validated erectile-function score against sham at six to twelve months, with objective flow measures where possible. Self-reported improvement in an unblinded study, in men who paid several thousand euros, is the definition of a low-information endpoint.

What we can say from registrations alone

  • Volume: 35 registered studies since 2010.
  • Maturity: 2 confirmatory-phase records.
  • Delivery: 12 completed; 4 terminated, withdrawn or suspended.
  • Scale: median planned enrolment 30 participants, largest 5,000.

The completed studies

Completed does not mean published, and published does not mean positive. These are the finished records — the starting point for checking whether results ever appeared.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT01953523 — Safety and Clinical Outcomes Study: SVF Deployment for Orthopedic, Neurologic, Urologic, and Cardio-pulmonary Conditionsn/aCompleted3,000Elliot Lander2013-09-02
NCT04594850 — Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) Injected IntracavernouslyPhase 2Completed54Pharmicell Co., Ltd.2020-10-19
NCT06600893 — Sham-Controlled Prospective Study Characterizing Erectile Tissue Ultrasound Changes Resulting From Penile LiSWTn/aCompleted35San Diego Sexual Medicine2019-08-05
NCT04771442 — Stem Cell Treatment of Peyronie´s Disease.Phase 1Completed22Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark2022-09-09
NCT01089387 — Intracavernous Bone Marrow Stem-cell Injection for Post Prostatectomy Erectile DysfunctionPhase 1, Phase 2Completed18Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, F2010-05
NCT07245875 — Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Secretome Administration in Severe Erectile Dysfunction Non-responsive to Sildenafiln/aCompleted12Indonesia University2024-04-12

What registrations cannot tell you

Whether results were positive. Whether they were published at all — a large share of registered studies never report outcomes, which biases what the literature appears to show. And whether the product a commercial clinic sells resembles the product studied: cell source, dose, processing and delivery route vary enormously between a registered protocol and an off-protocol injection.

How to use this when someone is selling you a treatment

Ask which specific registered study supports the offer, then compare its intervention description with your quote. If the answer is a general gesture at "Erectile Dysfunction research", you are being sold the field's activity rather than evidence about the product. The Provider Question Builder turns that gap into questions.

Frequently asked

How strong is the evidence for stem-cell therapy in Erectile Dysfunction?

ClinicalTrials.gov registrations alone cannot establish how strong the evidence is. Registry activity is active but still early, with limited late-phase registration: 35 registered records, 2 at Phase 3/4 and 4 stopped early (2026-08-29).

Has any stem-cell product been approved for this condition?

Approval is product-and-indication specific and changes over time; check the FDA, EMA or your national regulator directly rather than relying on a clinic's summary.

Why do clinics cite hundreds of studies?

Volume is the cheapest form of credibility. Ask instead for the controlled studies of the specific product, and read what outcome they measured.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads