Question

How strong is the evidence for stem-cell therapy in Scleroderma (Systemic Sclerosis)?

ClinicalTrials.gov registrations alone cannot establish how strong the evidence is. Registry activity is relatively mature, with multiple Phase 3/4 registrations: the registry holds 44 records, 17 completed, 5 at Phase 3 or 4, and 8 stopped early (18%). MSC-specific work accounts for 11 of those records. These counts describe research activity and maturity, not benefit, safety or certainty. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

What counts as a real result in Scleroderma (Systemic Sclerosis)

Endpoints are event-free survival, skin score, lung function and mortality over years. Any presentation of transplantation for scleroderma that omits treatment-related mortality is not describing the published evidence.

What we can say from registrations alone

  • Volume: 44 registered studies since 1999.
  • Maturity: 5 confirmatory-phase records.
  • Delivery: 17 completed; 8 terminated, withdrawn or suspended.
  • Scale: median planned enrolment 20 participants, largest 200.

The completed studies

Completed does not mean published, and published does not mean positive. These are the finished records — the starting point for checking whether results ever appeared.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT02516124 — EBMT ADWP Prospective Non Interventional Study : AutoHSCT in SSc Patientsn/aCompleted82European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2012-12
NCT00114530 — Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or TransplantationPhase 2, Phase 3Completed75National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID2005-06
NCT04464434 — Upfront Autologous HSCT Versus Immunosuppression in Early Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic SclerosisPhase 4Completed60UMC Utrecht2020-09-17
NCT01895244 — Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Progressive Systemic SclerosisPhase 2Completed44University Hospital Tuebingen2012-09
NCT01347008 — Effect of Sildenafil on the Microcirculatory Blood Flow and Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Systemic SclerosisPhase 3Completed41Federal University of São Paulo2011-04
NCT05528809 — Quantification and Characterization of Circulating Epithelial and Endothelial Cells in Gougerot-Sjögren Syndrome, Compared to Systemic Sclerosisn/aCompleted40University Hospital, Montpellier2022-09-27

What registrations cannot tell you

Whether results were positive. Whether they were published at all — a large share of registered studies never report outcomes, which biases what the literature appears to show. And whether the product a commercial clinic sells resembles the product studied: cell source, dose, processing and delivery route vary enormously between a registered protocol and an off-protocol injection.

How to use this when someone is selling you a treatment

Ask which specific registered study supports the offer, then compare its intervention description with your quote. If the answer is a general gesture at "Scleroderma (Systemic Sclerosis) research", you are being sold the field's activity rather than evidence about the product. The Provider Question Builder turns that gap into questions.

Frequently asked

How strong is the evidence for stem-cell therapy in Scleroderma (Systemic Sclerosis)?

ClinicalTrials.gov registrations alone cannot establish how strong the evidence is. Registry activity is relatively mature, with multiple Phase 3/4 registrations: 44 registered records, 5 at Phase 3/4 and 8 stopped early (2026-08-29).

Has any stem-cell product been approved for this condition?

That has to be checked per product with the regulator that governs where you would be treated. A clinic's own claim of approval is not verification.

Why do clinics cite hundreds of studies?

Volume is the cheapest form of credibility. Ask instead for the controlled studies of the specific product, and read what outcome they measured.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads