Registry evidence

Back Pain & Disc Degeneration and Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC): what the trial registry contains

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry holds 20 records for MSC in Back Pain & Disc Degeneration: 1 recruiting now, 1 labelled Phase 3 or 4, across 9 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Why this is studied in Back Pain & Disc Degeneration

Degenerative disc disease is the usual registry target: dehydrated discs, annular tears and facet loading. Injected cells are proposed to restore disc matrix or damp inflammatory pain signalling. The complication is that imaging findings correlate poorly with pain, so a treatment can change the disc without changing the symptom, and vice versa.

What MSC means in this table

Mesenchymal stromal cells are the workhorse of commercial cell therapy: easy to source from fat, cord or marrow, easy to expand, and rarely characterised in the same way twice. Their proposed action is paracrine — signalling molecules that damp inflammation — rather than replacement of lost tissue. That matters when reading counts like these, because two studies filed under the same label can test materially different products at different doses by different routes.

The numbers

Every figure below comes from one reproducible query (degenerative disc disease x mesenchymal stem cell) run against ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 on 2026-08-29.

MetricValue
Registered studies (all statuses)20
Interventional studies in the sample15
Recruiting right now1
Completed5
Terminated, withdrawn or suspended5
Phase 3 or Phase 4 records1
Countries with at least one site9
Median planned enrolment20 participants
Largest single planned enrolment404 participants
First / most recent start year2010 — 2026

How mature is this evidence?

Only 1 of 20 registrations reached a confirmatory phase label, so most of what a clinic can cite is exploratory work by design.

Completion status: 5 completed, 5 stopped early (25% of all records). A registration is a plan, not a result.

Phase labelRecordsShare
Not applicable833%
Phase 2833%
Phase 1625%
Early Phase 114%
Phase 314%

Median planned enrolment is 20 participants (largest single study: 404). Trials of this size can describe safety and generate hypotheses; detecting a modest clinical benefit reliably usually needs substantially larger numbers with a control group.

Where the studies are

Research is not evenly spread: United States carries about 25% of the country mentions among 9 countries with sites.

CountryStudies with a site there
United States5
South Korea3
Italy3
China2
Spain2
Australia2
Taiwan1
Indonesia1
Slovakia1

Legal pathway differs by country — see where cell therapy is legal, by country.

Who runs them

Sponsorship leans commercial: 3 of the most frequent lead sponsors read as academic or hospital entities and 8 as companies. Who pays shapes what gets measured and what gets published.

  • Red de Terapia Celular — 3 records
  • Inbo Han — 2 records
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico — 2 records
  • Mesoblast, Ltd. — 2 records
  • The Foundation for Spinal Research, Education and Humanitarian Care, Inc. — 1 record
  • Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc — 1 record

Representative registered studies

Recruiting studies first, then the most advanced phases. Each identifier links to the registry record, where eligibility criteria, outcome measures and contacts are published.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT05066334 — Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of Autologous BM-MSC in Subjects With Chronic LBP Due to Multilevel Lumbar IDDPhase 2Recruiting52Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico2021-03-22
NCT02412735 — Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Rexlemestrocel-L Alone or Combined With Hyaluronic Acid in Participants With Chronic Low Back PainPhase 3Completed404Mesoblast, Ltd.2015-03-06
NCT05011474 — Safety and Efficacy Study of Matrilin-3 Pretreated Autologous Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Implantation in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients WiPhase 1, Phase 2Unknown4Inbo Han2021-04-23
NCT04759105 — Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of Autologous BM-MSC in Worker Patients Affected by Chronic LBP Due to Multilevel IDDPhase 2Completed48Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico2019-11-03
NCT04499105 — Effectiveness and Safety of Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) Implantation on Degenerative Discus Disease PatientsPhase 2Unknown10Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim2017-07-24
NCT01860417 — Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease With Allogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSV)Phase 1, Phase 2Completed24Red de Terapia Celular2013-06-21
NCT02440074 — Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease Treatment With Bone Marrow Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSV)Phase 1, Phase 2Withdrawnn/aRed de Terapia Celular2011-06
NCT01290367 — Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Study of Mesenchymal Precursor Cells (MPCs) in Subjects With Lumbar Back PainPhase 2Completed100Mesoblast, Ltd.2011-08
NCT01513694 — Clinical Trial Based on the Use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Autologous Bone Marrow in Patients With Lumbar Intervertebral Degenerative Disc DiseasePhase 1, Phase 2Completed15Red de Terapia Celular2010-01
NCT06589271 — SCLife®-LDD hUC-MSCs Injection Therapy for Patients With Lumbar Intervertebral Disc DegenerationPhase 1Suspended20Sclnow Biotechnology Co., Ltd.2026-12-31

What this page does and does not tell you

None of these numbers say the therapy works. They say how much organised research exists and how far along it is; effect sizes live in published results, not registry entries.

If a clinic offers you this today, the useful question is not "is there research?" but "which of these registered studies is mine part of, and if none, what evidence applies to the exact product I am being sold?" The Provider Question Builder turns that into a scored checklist.

Frequently asked

How many MSC studies for Back Pain & Disc Degeneration are recruiting right now?

1 of 20 registered records were listed as recruiting in the 2026-08-29 snapshot. Recruitment status changes frequently; the registry record is authoritative.

Is MSC an approved treatment for Back Pain & Disc Degeneration?

Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov is not approval. Approval is granted by a regulator for a specific product and indication after review of submitted evidence. 20 registered studies tell you research exists, not that a product cleared review.

How advanced is the research on MSC for Back Pain & Disc Degeneration?

1 of 20 records carry a Phase 3 or Phase 4 label and 5 are marked completed. Registrations run from 2010 to 2026.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.