Registry evidence

Hair Loss & Restoration and Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): what the trial registry contains

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry holds 26 records for PRP in Hair Loss & Restoration: 2 recruiting now, 3 labelled Phase 3 or 4, across 7 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Why this is studied in Hair Loss & Restoration

Androgenetic alopecia is a hormone-driven miniaturisation of follicles, not follicle death, which is why regenerative approaches are biologically plausible: the target still exists. It is also the one tracked indication where exosome registrations outnumber whole-cell studies, reflecting how quickly aesthetic markets adopt cell-free products.

What PRP means in this table

Platelet-rich plasma is a blood product, not a stem-cell product, though it is routinely sold as part of the same package. Preparation varies enormously between systems — platelet concentration, leukocyte content and activation all differ — so the label describes a category of procedure rather than a defined substance, which is the main reason its trial literature is so inconsistent.

The numbers

Every figure below comes from one reproducible query (androgenetic alopecia x platelet-rich plasma) run against ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 on 2026-08-29.

MetricValue
Registered studies (all statuses)26
Interventional studies in the sample24
Recruiting right now2
Completed10
Terminated, withdrawn or suspended2
Phase 3 or Phase 4 records3
Countries with at least one site7
Median planned enrolment30 participants
Largest single planned enrolment201 participants
First / most recent start year2011 — 2026

How mature is this evidence?

The field has produced some later-stage designs — 3 of the 26 records carry a Phase 3 or 4 label — but the bulk of activity remains earlier-phase safety and signal-finding work.

2 of these records (8%) were terminated, withdrawn or suspended, against 10 marked completed; unfinished studies rarely appear in marketing summaries.

Phase labelRecordsShare
Not applicable1241%
Phase 2828%
Early Phase 1310%
Phase 4310%
Phase 1310%

Median planned enrolment is 30 participants (largest single study: 201). Trials of this size can describe safety and generate hypotheses; detecting a modest clinical benefit reliably usually needs substantially larger numbers with a control group.

Where the studies are

Sites are spread across 7 countries, with United States accounting for roughly 35% of country mentions — geography reflects where regulators permit this work and where sponsors sit, not where care is best.

CountryStudies with a site there
United States7
Indonesia3
Egypt3
China3
Pakistan2
Spain1
Canada1

Legal pathway differs by country — see where cell therapy is legal, by country.

Who runs them

Funding profile: 7 academic or hospital sponsors against 1 commercial ones — academic overall, which is worth knowing before reading any single positive report.

  • Indonesia University — 2 records
  • Sohag University — 2 records
  • Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady — 1 record
  • Montefiore Medical Center — 1 record
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai — 1 record
  • Kimberly Meathrel — 1 record

Representative registered studies

Recruiting studies first, then the most advanced phases. Each identifier links to the registry record, where eligibility criteria, outcome measures and contacts are published.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT07429253 — Secretome vs. PRP Injections for Hair Density and Growth in Androgenetic Alopecia PatientsPhase 1, Phase 2Recruiting40PT. Prodia Stem Cell Indonesia2026-01-09
NCT07335367 — PRP Combined With Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia: A StudyPhase 2Recruiting76Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University2026-01-09
NCT06043349 — Effectiveness and Safety of Platelet-rich Plasma and Topical 5% Minoxidil Combination in Male Androgenetic AlopeciaPhase 4Unknown36Indonesia University2023-06-01
NCT03388840 — Adipose Derived Stem Cells Versus Platelet Rich Plasma on Follicular Unit ExtractionPhase 4Unknown40Assiut University2018-01-15
NCT02999737 — Comparing Different Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) Treatment Regimens for Management of Androgenic AlopeciaPhase 4Unknown40Skin Care and Laser Physicians of Beverly Hills2016-11
NCT07348315 — Effectiveness of Apheresis Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Androgenic AlopeciaPhase 2Completed201zhang li2023-09-01
NCT06239207 — Efficacy and Safety of Exosomes Versus Platelet Rich Plasma in Patients of Androgenetic AlopeciaPhase 2Completed30Services Hospital, Lahore2023-09-21
NCT05348343 — Activated PRP for Treatment of Androgenetic AlopeciaPhase 1, Phase 2Completed17Santiste Medical Inc.2022-05-17
NCT03048461 — The Effect of Platelet-rich Plasma in Subjects With Androgenetic AlopeciaPhase 2Withdrawnn/aNorthwestern University2019-06
NCT02865421 — Adipose Tissue Derived Stem Cell Based Hair Restoration Therapy for Androgenetic AlopeciaPhase 2Completed22King Edward Medical University2017-06-10

What this page does and does not tell you

Registration counts measure activity, not effect. A study appears here the moment it is registered — before any participant is enrolled, and regardless of whether results are ever posted.

If a clinic offers you this today, the useful question is not "is there research?" but "which of these registered studies is mine part of, and if none, what evidence applies to the exact product I am being sold?" The Provider Question Builder turns that into a scored checklist.

Frequently asked

How many PRP studies for Hair Loss & Restoration are recruiting right now?

2 of 26 registered records were listed as recruiting in the 2026-08-29 snapshot. Recruitment status changes frequently; the registry record is authoritative.

Is PRP an approved treatment for Hair Loss & Restoration?

Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov is not approval. Approval is granted by a regulator for a specific product and indication after review of submitted evidence. 26 registered studies tell you research exists, not that a product cleared review.

How advanced is the research on PRP for Hair Loss & Restoration?

3 of 26 records carry a Phase 3 or Phase 4 label and 10 are marked completed. Registrations run from 2011 to 2026.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.