Evidence hub

Spinal Cord Injury: cell-therapy evidence by therapy class

Across every stem-cell intervention, ClinicalTrials.gov holds 70 registered records for Spinal Cord Injury — 7 recruiting, 3 at Phase 3 or 4, in 19 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

The condition, and why cells are proposed

Traumatic spinal cord injury combines the initial mechanical lesion with secondary inflammation, cavity formation and glial scarring. Cell strategies aim to bridge or protect rather than regrow a cord. Timing splits the field sharply: acute neuroprotection and chronic reconstruction are different scientific problems with different evidence.

Therapy classes side by side

Therapy classRegisteredRecruitingPhase 3/4Countries
MSC382211
HSCT11017
exosomes1001
PRP1001

Counts come from separate registry queries per class; a study testing two interventions can appear in more than one row, so rows do not sum to the all-interventions total.

Geography of the research

United States accounts for about 26% of country mentions among sampled studies; 19 countries host at least one site.

CountryStudies with a site there
United States16
China14
Spain8
India6
Brazil4
South Korea4
Russia3
Jordan3

The largest registered studies

Sorted by planned enrolment — size is not quality, but a 300-participant trial can answer questions a 12-participant series cannot.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT02795052 — Neurologic Stem Cell Treatment Studyn/aRecruiting500MD Stem Cells2016-06
NCT01873547 — Different Efficacy Between Rehabilitation Therapy and Stem Cells Transplantation in Patients With SCI in ChinaPhase 3Completed300General Hospital of Chinese Armed Police Forces2012-06
NCT03390920 — Evaluation of Outcomes With Umbilical Cord Allograft for Musculoskeletal Conditions Musculoskeletal Conditionsn/aNot Yet Recruiting200R3 Stem Cell2022-01-01
NCT02481440 — Repeated Subarachnoid Administrations of hUC-MSCs in Treating SCIPhase 1, Phase 2Completed102Limin Rong2018-03-30
NCT03521336 — Intrathecal Transplantation of UC-MSC in Patients With Sub-Acute Spinal Cord InjuryPhase 2Unknown84Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University2019-09-01
NCT05693181 — Cord Blood Cells in Patients With Acute SCIPhase 1, Phase 2Unknown80Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency Care2022-12-05

Most recently registered

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT06974968 — Efficacy of iPSC-Derived Motor Neuron Cells (XS228) in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury: A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trialn/aNot Yet Recruitingn/aXellSmart Bio-Pharmaceutical (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.2028-05-25
NCT07739043 — NeuroRise: Intrathecal CE-1 Treatment for Traumatic SCIn/aNot Yet Recruitingn/aCell Therapy LLC2026-09
NCT07295067 — Extracellular Vesicles for the Treatment of Syringomyelian/aActive Not Recruitingn/aXuanwu Hospital, Beijing2025-12-23
NCT07253233 — Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury Using Autologous Concentrated Growth Factorsn/aNot Yet Recruitingn/aThird Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University2025-12-01
NCT06981338 — Guttmann NeuroRecovery - Viability, Safety, and Efficacy of Intrathecal Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulatn/aNot Yet Recruitingn/aInstitut Guttmann2025-09-01

Reading this honestly

Treat this as a map of research activity. It tells you whether a claim has an evidence programme behind it — not whether the treatment helped anyone. For Spinal Cord Injury specifically, the practical question is which registered study — if any — matches the product a provider is offering, and what its outcome measures actually are.

Frequently asked

How many stem-cell trials exist for Spinal Cord Injury?

70 registered records mention a stem-cell intervention for this condition (2026-08-29 snapshot), of which 7 were recruiting.

Which therapy class is furthest along for Spinal Cord Injury?

Ranked by Phase 3/4 records: MSC (2), HSCT (1), exosomes (0), PRP (0).

Does a recruiting trial mean I can be treated?

No. Trials have eligibility criteria, and joining one is not the same as buying a treatment. Paying a clinic for an unproven intervention outside a registered study gives you neither the protections nor the data collection of a trial.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.