Registry evidence

Tendon & Sports Injuries and Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): what the trial registry contains

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry holds 67 records for PRP in Tendon & Sports Injuries: 7 recruiting now, 17 labelled Phase 3 or 4, across 21 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Why this is studied in Tendon & Sports Injuries

Tendinopathy is degenerative rather than inflammatory: disorganised collagen and neovascularisation from chronic overload. This is the orthobiologics heartland, where PRP is far more commonly used than cells, and where eccentric loading programmes remain the intervention with the most consistent evidence.

What PRP means in this table

Platelet-rich plasma is a blood product, not a stem-cell product, though it is routinely sold as part of the same package. Preparation varies enormously between systems — platelet concentration, leukocyte content and activation all differ — so the label describes a category of procedure rather than a defined substance, which is the main reason its trial literature is so inconsistent.

The numbers

Every figure below comes from one reproducible query (tendinopathy x platelet-rich plasma) run against ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 on 2026-08-29.

MetricValue
Registered studies (all statuses)67
Interventional studies in the sample63
Recruiting right now7
Completed32
Terminated, withdrawn or suspended11
Phase 3 or Phase 4 records17
Countries with at least one site21
Median planned enrolment62 participants
Largest single planned enrolment10,000 participants
First / most recent start year2007 — 2026

How mature is this evidence?

This is one of the more developed corners of the field: 17 of the 67 registered records carry a Phase 3 or Phase 4 label, meaning sponsors believed earlier data justified a confirmatory attempt.

Completion status: 32 completed, 11 stopped early (16% of all records). A registration is a plan, not a result.

Phase labelRecordsShare
Not applicable4160%
Phase 41015%
Phase 2812%
Phase 3710%
Early Phase 111%
Phase 111%

Median planned enrolment is 62 participants (largest single study: 10,000). Trials of this size can describe safety and generate hypotheses; detecting a modest clinical benefit reliably usually needs substantially larger numbers with a control group.

Where the studies are

Sites are spread across 21 countries, with United States accounting for roughly 45% of country mentions — geography reflects where regulators permit this work and where sponsors sit, not where care is best.

CountryStudies with a site there
United States23
Turkey (Türkiye)5
Spain5
Poland4
United Kingdom3
Italy3
Netherlands2
Finland2
Taiwan2
South Korea2

Legal pathway differs by country — see where cell therapy is legal, by country.

Who runs them

The sponsor mix is academic (12 academic or hospital, 5 commercial among the most frequent lead sponsors).

  • University of Wisconsin, Madison — 5 records
  • Stanford University — 3 records
  • Zimmer Biomet — 3 records
  • Kaiser Permanente — 2 records
  • Hospital for Special Surgery, New York — 2 records
  • Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University — 2 records

Representative registered studies

Recruiting studies first, then the most advanced phases. Each identifier links to the registry record, where eligibility criteria, outcome measures and contacts are published.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT07714811 — Hyaluronic Acid Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma for Chronic Tendinopathy and Enthesopathyn/aRecruiting80Ortonika Orthopedic Medical Clinic in Lublin2026-06-10
NCT07558564 — Evaluation of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Treatment in Tendinopathiesn/aRecruiting2,000ReSport Clinic2026-04
NCT07231471 — Platelet Rich Plasma for Musculoskeletal Conditionsn/aRecruiting10,000University of Utah2025-12-29
NCT07094178 — Corticosteroid Versus PRP Injections for Shoulder Tendinopathyn/aRecruiting60Hopital Charles Nicolle2025-06-30
NCT06536582 — Nutrition Impact on PRGF Treatment for Tendinopathyn/aRecruiting52I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio2024-02-15
NCT06040203 — Leukocyte-rich PRP or Leukocyte-free PRP vs Placebo in the Treatment of Epicondylitisn/aRecruiting240Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli2023-03-23
NCT03984955 — Comparing Injection Treatments for Tennis Elbown/aRecruiting123Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust2018-04-18
NCT06160427 — Connective Tissue Matrix for Rotator Cuff TendinopathyPhase 4Active Not Recruiting92Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny2023-12-04
NCT05603468 — Effect of PRP vs Corticosteroid in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy Subtypes in Arthroscopic RepairPhase 4Active Not Recruiting387Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of M2022-12-15
NCT06815042 — The Analysis of Efficacy Factors for Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy in the Treatment of Elbow TendinopathyPhase 4Not Yet Recruiting30CHA University2025-02

What this page does and does not tell you

A registry is a plan repository. Counting entries tells you what people intended to study, which is a weaker thing than what they found.

If a clinic offers you this today, the useful question is not "is there research?" but "which of these registered studies is mine part of, and if none, what evidence applies to the exact product I am being sold?" The Provider Question Builder turns that into a scored checklist.

Frequently asked

How many PRP studies for Tendon & Sports Injuries are recruiting right now?

7 of 67 registered records were listed as recruiting in the 2026-08-29 snapshot. Recruitment status changes frequently; the registry record is authoritative.

Is PRP an approved treatment for Tendon & Sports Injuries?

Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov is not approval. Approval is granted by a regulator for a specific product and indication after review of submitted evidence. 67 registered studies tell you research exists, not that a product cleared review.

How advanced is the research on PRP for Tendon & Sports Injuries?

17 of 67 records carry a Phase 3 or Phase 4 label and 32 are marked completed. Registrations run from 2007 to 2026.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.