Registry evidence

Chronic Wounds & Ulcers and Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): what the trial registry contains

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry holds 26 records for PRP in Chronic Wounds & Ulcers: 2 recruiting now, 3 labelled Phase 3 or 4, across 10 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Why this is studied in Chronic Wounds & Ulcers

The registry entries here centre on diabetic foot ulcers, where impaired healing reflects neuropathy, ischaemia and infection together. Cell and vesicle products aim to restore a functional healing environment. This is one of the few areas with a genuine regulatory precedent for advanced wound products, so evidence standards are comparatively well defined.

What PRP means in this table

Platelet-rich plasma is a blood product, not a stem-cell product, though it is routinely sold as part of the same package. Preparation varies enormously between systems — platelet concentration, leukocyte content and activation all differ — so the label describes a category of procedure rather than a defined substance, which is the main reason its trial literature is so inconsistent.

The numbers

Every figure below comes from one reproducible query (diabetic foot ulcer x platelet-rich plasma) run against ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 on 2026-08-29.

MetricValue
Registered studies (all statuses)26
Interventional studies in the sample24
Recruiting right now2
Completed10
Terminated, withdrawn or suspended5
Phase 3 or Phase 4 records3
Countries with at least one site10
Median planned enrolment40 participants
Largest single planned enrolment1,500 participants
First / most recent start year2008 — 2025

How mature is this evidence?

The ladder is partly climbed: 3 confirmatory-phase records against 26 in total, with the remainder concentrated in dose-finding and safety territory.

Registrations do not all survive contact with recruitment — 10 completed here, 5 stopped early, giving a 19% attrition rate.

Phase labelRecordsShare
Not applicable1550%
Phase 2620%
Phase 1517%
Phase 327%
Phase 413%
Early Phase 113%

Median planned enrolment is 40 participants (largest single study: 1,500). Trials of this size can describe safety and generate hypotheses; detecting a modest clinical benefit reliably usually needs substantially larger numbers with a control group.

Where the studies are

Across 10 countries with registered sites, United States dominates at roughly 33% — a concentration driven by funding and regulation rather than by clinical outcome.

CountryStudies with a site there
United States8
Iran3
Egypt3
Pakistan3
China2
United Kingdom1
Mexico1
Taiwan1
Italy1
Jordan1

Legal pathway differs by country — see where cell therapy is legal, by country.

Who runs them

The sponsor mix is academic (7 academic or hospital, 3 commercial among the most frequent lead sponsors).

  • Cytomedix — 3 records
  • Mashhad University of Medical Sciences — 2 records
  • Peking University Third Hospital — 2 records
  • Zagazig University — 1 record
  • Multan Medical And Dental College — 1 record
  • Mansoura University — 1 record

Representative registered studies

Recruiting studies first, then the most advanced phases. Each identifier links to the registry record, where eligibility criteria, outcome measures and contacts are published.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT06810726 — Evaluate Use of Tropocells(R) Autologous Platelet-rich Fibrin (PRF) for Wagner Grade 1 and Grade 2, Mild to Mod Neuroischemic Plantar Diabetic Foot UlPhase 2Recruiting30Estar Medical dba Medical Technologies, LTD2025-04-15
NCT05610865 — Efficacy of Adipose Tissue Derived Stem Cells for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot UlcersPhase 1Recruiting28University of the Punjab2020-11-20
NCT02248077 — A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Study Evaluating AutoloGel Therapy for Complete Closure of Wagner Grade 1-4 Diabetic Foot Ulcers,Phase 4Withdrawnn/aCytomedix2014-10
NCT04689425 — Umbilical Cord Blood Mononuclear Cell Gel in the Treatment of Refractory Diabetic Foot UlcerPhase 3Unknown40Peking University Third Hospital2021-03-30
NCT04315909 — The Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma-Fibrin Glue in Combination With Vitamin E and C for Treatment of Non-healing Diabetic Foot UlcersPhase 2, Phase 3Unknown24Mashhad University of Medical Sciences2019-08-28
NCT06680856 — Allogeneic Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) to Treat Diabetic Foot UlcersPhase 1, Phase 2Completed72Ospedale Policlinico San Martino2021-02-23
NCT04750837 — Platelet Rich Plasma and Diabetic Foot UlcerPhase 2Completed72Zagazig University2020-01-16
NCT02972528 — The Use of Allogenic Platelet Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot UlcerPhase 1, Phase 2Unknown30Hanan Jafar2018-02-03
NCT02134132 — Utilization of Platelet Gel for Treatment of Diabetic Foot UlcersPhase 1, Phase 2Completed30Royan Institute2012-01
NCT02993809 — Autologous Transplantation of BM-ECs With Platelet-Rich Plasma Extract for the Treatment of Critical Limb IschemiaPhase 1Unknown40South China Research Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative M2018-03

What this page does and does not tell you

None of these numbers say the therapy works. They say how much organised research exists and how far along it is; effect sizes live in published results, not registry entries.

If a clinic offers you this today, the useful question is not "is there research?" but "which of these registered studies is mine part of, and if none, what evidence applies to the exact product I am being sold?" The Provider Question Builder turns that into a scored checklist.

Frequently asked

How many PRP studies for Chronic Wounds & Ulcers are recruiting right now?

2 of 26 registered records were listed as recruiting in the 2026-08-29 snapshot. Recruitment status changes frequently; the registry record is authoritative.

Is PRP an approved treatment for Chronic Wounds & Ulcers?

Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov is not approval. Approval is granted by a regulator for a specific product and indication after review of submitted evidence. 26 registered studies tell you research exists, not that a product cleared review.

How advanced is the research on PRP for Chronic Wounds & Ulcers?

3 of 26 records carry a Phase 3 or Phase 4 label and 10 are marked completed. Registrations run from 2008 to 2025.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.