Question

How strong is the evidence for stem-cell therapy in Arterial Hypertension?

ClinicalTrials.gov registrations alone cannot establish how strong the evidence is. Registry activity is relatively mature, with multiple Phase 3/4 registrations: the registry holds 35 records, 17 completed, 5 at Phase 3 or 4, and 2 stopped early (6%). MSC-specific work accounts for 11 of those records. These counts describe research activity and maturity, not benefit, safety or certainty. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

What counts as a real result in Arterial Hypertension

Credible evidence uses 24-hour ambulatory readings, not clinic cuffs, over months rather than weeks, with medication changes documented. The real endpoint is cardiovascular events; surrogate pressure changes are only a starting point, and a single reading after an infusion is noise.

What we can say from registrations alone

  • Volume: 35 registered studies since 2001.
  • Maturity: 5 confirmatory-phase records.
  • Delivery: 17 completed; 2 terminated, withdrawn or suspended.
  • Scale: median planned enrolment 46 participants, largest 500.

The completed studies

Completed does not mean published, and published does not mean positive. These are the finished records — the starting point for checking whether results ever appeared.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT03562715 — microRNAs Role in Pre-eclampsia Diagnosisn/aCompleted200Cairo University2016-11-28
NCT00013975 — Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Diseasen/aCompleted120National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)2001-03
NCT00641836 — Safety and Feasibility of Autologous Endothelial Progenitor Cells Transplantation in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertensionn/aCompleted98Zhejiang University2005-07
NCT01041287 — Effect of Nebivolol on Oxidative Stress and Endothelial Progenitor CellsPhase 4Completed96Emory University2009-12
NCT02266394 — Hypoxia and Inflammatory Injury in Human Renovascular HypertensionPhase 1Completed42Mayo Clinic2014-10-21
NCT02937922 — Effect of Exercise on Endothelial Injury in Hypertensive Patientsn/aCompleted33Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul2016-01

What registrations cannot tell you

Whether results were positive. Whether they were published at all — a large share of registered studies never report outcomes, which biases what the literature appears to show. And whether the product a commercial clinic sells resembles the product studied: cell source, dose, processing and delivery route vary enormously between a registered protocol and an off-protocol injection.

How to use this when someone is selling you a treatment

Ask which specific registered study supports the offer, then compare its intervention description with your quote. If the answer is a general gesture at "Arterial Hypertension research", you are being sold the field's activity rather than evidence about the product. The Provider Question Builder turns that gap into questions.

Frequently asked

How strong is the evidence for stem-cell therapy in Arterial Hypertension?

ClinicalTrials.gov registrations alone cannot establish how strong the evidence is. Registry activity is relatively mature, with multiple Phase 3/4 registrations: 35 registered records, 5 at Phase 3/4 and 2 stopped early (2026-08-29).

Has any stem-cell product been approved for this condition?

Look it up at source: regulators publish authorised products and indications. Registration of a trial, a licence to operate a clinic and product approval are three different things.

Why do clinics cite hundreds of studies?

Because the registry is public and impressive-looking. What it cannot show — published, controlled outcomes for the exact product — is the part that decides the question.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads