Registry evidence

Anemia and Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC): what the trial registry contains

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry holds 10 records for MSC in Anemia: 0 recruiting now, 1 labelled Phase 3 or 4, across 3 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Why this is studied in Anemia

Under 'anaemia' the registry mostly holds aplastic anaemia and marrow-failure syndromes, where haematopoietic transplantation is not experimental at all — it is standard care with decades of protocol refinement. Mesenchymal cells appear alongside it as a graft-support and graft-versus-host-disease adjunct, which is a different and much less settled question.

What MSC means in this table

Mesenchymal stromal cells are the workhorse of commercial cell therapy: easy to source from fat, cord or marrow, easy to expand, and rarely characterised in the same way twice. Their proposed action is paracrine — signalling molecules that damp inflammation — rather than replacement of lost tissue. That matters when reading counts like these, because two studies filed under the same label can test materially different products at different doses by different routes.

The numbers

Every figure below comes from one reproducible query (aplastic anemia x mesenchymal stem cell) run against ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 on 2026-08-29.

MetricValue
Registered studies (all statuses)10
Interventional studies in the sample10
Recruiting right now0
Completed1
Terminated, withdrawn or suspended1
Phase 3 or Phase 4 records1
Countries with at least one site3
Median planned enrolment25 participants
Largest single planned enrolment100 participants
First / most recent start year2010 — 2026

How mature is this evidence?

A small later-stage tail exists (1 of 10 records at Phase 3 or 4); the centre of gravity is still Phase 1 and 2 work sized for safety rather than proof of benefit.

Completion status: 1 completed, 1 stopped early (10% of all records). A registration is a plan, not a result.

Phase labelRecordsShare
Phase 2747%
Phase 1640%
Not applicable17%
Phase 417%

Median planned enrolment is 25 participants (largest single study: 100). Trials of this size can describe safety and generate hypotheses; detecting a modest clinical benefit reliably usually needs substantially larger numbers with a control group.

Where the studies are

The work is distributed across 3 countries; China alone accounts for about 80% of mentions, so 'internationally researched' can still mean concentrated in a few regulatory environments.

CountryStudies with a site there
China8
Brazil1
Russia1

Legal pathway differs by country — see where cell therapy is legal, by country.

Who runs them

Funding profile: 7 academic or hospital sponsors against 0 commercial ones — academic overall, which is worth knowing before reading any single positive report.

  • Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command — 2 records
  • Chinese PLA General Hospital — 1 record
  • University of Sao Paulo — 1 record
  • Navy General Hospital, Beijing — 1 record
  • Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute — 1 record
  • Hebei Medical University — 1 record

Representative registered studies

Recruiting studies first, then the most advanced phases. Each identifier links to the registry record, where eligibility criteria, outcome measures and contacts are published.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT02218437 — Treatment Protocol of Child SAA With the Injection of Mesenchymal Stem Cells(Umbilical Cord Derived)Phase 4Unknown20Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences2013-10
NCT07299123 — Phase I Clinical Study of Haplo-HSCT Combined With Hypoxic 3D-Cultured Umbilical Cord MSC for the Treatment of SAAPhase 1, Phase 2Enrolling By Invitation40Chinese PLA General Hospital2022-08-01
NCT02407470 — Safety and Efficacy of Patient's Own AD-MSC and AD-HSC Transplantation in Patients With Severe Aplastic AnemiaPhase 1, Phase 2Unknown90Navy General Hospital, Beijing2015-01
NCT02145923 — Effectiveness and Safety of MMSCs for Enhancing Hematopoietic Recovery and Prophylaxis of Neutropenic EnterocolitisPhase 1, Phase 2Unknown16Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center2014-05
NCT02247973 — Mesenchymal Stem Cells Co-transplantation in Alternative Donor Transplantation of Severe Aplastic Anemia.Phase 2Unknown100Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command2013-02
NCT01297972 — Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Severe Acquired Aplastic AnemiaPhase 1, Phase 2Completed9University of Sao Paulo2011-02
NCT01305694 — Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplantation to Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Aplastic Anemia.Phase 1, Phase 2Unknown50Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command2011-02
NCT01182662 — Safety and Efficacy Study of Umbilical Cord/Placenta-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Treat Severe Aplastic AnemiaPhase 2Unknown30Shandong University2010-08
NCT03055078 — Umbilical Cord Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Therapy in Aplastic AnemiaPhase 1Unknown10Hebei Medical University2017-01
NCT03351868 — FANCA Gene Transfer for Fanconi Anemia Using a High-safety, High-efficiency, Self-inactivating Lentiviral Vectorn/aTerminated10Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute2026-06-01

What this page does and does not tell you

These figures describe effort, not outcome. Published results, with their control arms and endpoints, are where benefit is decided.

If a clinic offers you this today, the useful question is not "is there research?" but "which of these registered studies is mine part of, and if none, what evidence applies to the exact product I am being sold?" The Provider Question Builder turns that into a scored checklist.

Frequently asked

How many MSC studies for Anemia are recruiting right now?

0 of 10 registered records were listed as recruiting in the 2026-08-29 snapshot. Recruitment status changes frequently; the registry record is authoritative.

Is MSC an approved treatment for Anemia?

Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov is not approval. Approval is granted by a regulator for a specific product and indication after review of submitted evidence. 10 registered studies tell you research exists, not that a product cleared review.

How advanced is the research on MSC for Anemia?

1 of 10 records carry a Phase 3 or Phase 4 label and 1 are marked completed. Registrations run from 2010 to 2026.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.