Registry evidence

Erectile Dysfunction and Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): what the trial registry contains

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry holds 22 records for PRP in Erectile Dysfunction: 1 recruiting now, 6 labelled Phase 3 or 4, across 11 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Why this is studied in Erectile Dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction is usually vascular and endothelial rather than structural, which is why regenerative approaches — cells, exosomes and shockwave adjuncts — target penile blood flow and nerve recovery. Post-prostatectomy nerve injury is a separate problem with a different time course, and the two are frequently blurred together in marketing.

What PRP means in this table

Platelet-rich plasma is a blood product, not a stem-cell product, though it is routinely sold as part of the same package. Preparation varies enormously between systems — platelet concentration, leukocyte content and activation all differ — so the label describes a category of procedure rather than a defined substance, which is the main reason its trial literature is so inconsistent.

The numbers

Every figure below comes from one reproducible query (erectile dysfunction x platelet-rich plasma) run against ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 on 2026-08-29.

MetricValue
Registered studies (all statuses)22
Interventional studies in the sample22
Recruiting right now1
Completed6
Terminated, withdrawn or suspended3
Phase 3 or Phase 4 records6
Countries with at least one site11
Median planned enrolment60 participants
Largest single planned enrolment160 participants
First / most recent start year2019 — 2026

How mature is this evidence?

Later-phase work exists but is not dominant (6 of 22), which is the typical profile of a field that has shown safety and is still testing whether benefit survives a control arm.

Completion status: 6 completed, 3 stopped early (14% of all records). A registration is a plan, not a result.

Phase labelRecordsShare
Phase 21036%
Not applicable621%
Phase 1621%
Phase 3518%
Phase 414%

Median planned enrolment is 60 participants (largest single study: 160). Trials of this size can describe safety and generate hypotheses; detecting a modest clinical benefit reliably usually needs substantially larger numbers with a control group.

Where the studies are

Country coverage runs to 11, but the distribution has a long tail behind United States at about 25% of mentions.

CountryStudies with a site there
United States5
Egypt4
Taiwan2
Spain2
Greece2
Kazakhstan1
Italy1
Lebanon1
China1
Turkey (Türkiye)1

Legal pathway differs by country — see where cell therapy is legal, by country.

Who runs them

Sponsorship leans academic: 11 of the most frequent lead sponsors read as academic or hospital entities and 0 as companies. Who pays shapes what gets measured and what gets published.

  • University of Miami — 3 records
  • Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece — 3 records
  • Benha University — 2 records
  • Mansoura University — 1 record
  • National Scientific Medical Center, Kazakhstan — 1 record
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari — 1 record

Representative registered studies

Recruiting studies first, then the most advanced phases. Each identifier links to the registry record, where eligibility criteria, outcome measures and contacts are published.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT07124871 — PRP Exosomes Therapy for Erectile DysfunctionPhase 2Recruiting30Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece2025-06-20
NCT06942988 — Efficacy of Intracavernous Platelet-rich Plasma Injection in the Treatment of Erectile DysfunctionPhase 3Active Not Recruiting34Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital2023-12-29
NCT07544537 — A Prospective Comparative Study of Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived and Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma and StPhase 2Active Not Recruiting100National Scientific Medical Center, Kazakhstan2024-09-09
NCT06433596 — Autologous PRP and Focal Shock Waves for Erectile Dysfunctionn/aActive Not Recruiting116Elexial Research Limited2024-05-06
NCT07602608 — Platelet-Rich Plasma With or Without Tadalafil for Erectile DysfunctionPhase 4Completed160Benha University2025-04-15
NCT07761806 — Comparsion of Effect of PRP,PDE5 Inhibitor in Treatment of Erectile DysfunctionPhase 2, Phase 3Completed75Ain Shams University2024-01-15
NCT05366504 — LiST Plus PRP Injection Therapy vs LiST Monotherapy for ED TreatmentPhase 2, Phase 3Unknown60Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece2022-09
NCT04357353 — The Role of Platelet Rich Plasma for Erectile DysfunctionPhase 3Terminated13University of Nebraska2021-04-01
NCT04050020 — Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Injection for Treatment of Erectile FunctionPhase 2, Phase 3Completed60Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece2019-09-02
NCT06550752 — Erectile Dysfunction Treatment Using Stem CellsPhase 1, Phase 2Not Yet Recruiting30COR clinic of Regenerative Medicine2024-08-10

What this page does and does not tell you

These figures describe effort, not outcome. Published results, with their control arms and endpoints, are where benefit is decided.

If a clinic offers you this today, the useful question is not "is there research?" but "which of these registered studies is mine part of, and if none, what evidence applies to the exact product I am being sold?" The Provider Question Builder turns that into a scored checklist.

Frequently asked

How many PRP studies for Erectile Dysfunction are recruiting right now?

1 of 22 registered records were listed as recruiting in the 2026-08-29 snapshot. Recruitment status changes frequently; the registry record is authoritative.

Is PRP an approved treatment for Erectile Dysfunction?

Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov is not approval. Approval is granted by a regulator for a specific product and indication after review of submitted evidence. 22 registered studies tell you research exists, not that a product cleared review.

How advanced is the research on PRP for Erectile Dysfunction?

6 of 22 records carry a Phase 3 or Phase 4 label and 6 are marked completed. Registrations run from 2019 to 2026.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.