Registry evidence

Heart Failure & Cardiac Repair and Haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT): what the trial registry contains

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry holds 13 records for HSCT in Heart Failure & Cardiac Repair: 1 recruiting now, 1 labelled Phase 3 or 4, across 14 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Why this is studied in Heart Failure & Cardiac Repair

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction involves lost cardiomyocytes and adverse remodelling. Cell therapy has been studied here longer than in almost any other indication, and the arc is instructive: early enthusiasm, mixed later-phase results, and a field that has narrowed its claims from regeneration to modest functional support.

What HSCT means in this table

Haematopoietic transplantation is the oldest and most consequential cell therapy in medicine, with conditioning regimens that carry real mortality risk alongside genuine disease-modifying power. Registrations under this label therefore mix decades-old standard-of-care protocols with newer autoimmune-reset trials, and the risk profile is nothing like that of an outpatient infusion.

The numbers

Every figure below comes from one reproducible query (heart failure x hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) run against ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 on 2026-08-29.

MetricValue
Registered studies (all statuses)13
Interventional studies in the sample12
Recruiting right now1
Completed6
Terminated, withdrawn or suspended2
Phase 3 or Phase 4 records1
Countries with at least one site14
Median planned enrolment40 participants
Largest single planned enrolment159 participants
First / most recent start year2006 — 2020

How mature is this evidence?

The ladder is partly climbed: 1 confirmatory-phase records against 13 in total, with the remainder concentrated in dose-finding and safety territory.

6 records are marked completed and 2 ended early (terminated, withdrawn or suspended): 15% of registrations did not run to plan.

Phase labelRecordsShare
Phase 2850%
Phase 1638%
Phase 316%
Not applicable16%

Median planned enrolment is 40 participants (largest single study: 159). Trials of this size can describe safety and generate hypotheses; detecting a modest clinical benefit reliably usually needs substantially larger numbers with a control group.

Where the studies are

Across 14 countries with registered sites, United States dominates at roughly 35% — a concentration driven by funding and regulation rather than by clinical outcome.

CountryStudies with a site there
United States6
Canada2
Iran2
China1
Japan1
Australia1
Austria1
Belgium1
France1
Italy1

Legal pathway differs by country — see where cell therapy is legal, by country.

Who runs them

Funding profile: 2 academic or hospital sponsors against 5 commercial ones — commercial overall, which is worth knowing before reading any single positive report.

  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center — 2 records
  • Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences — 1 record
  • Columbia University — 1 record
  • Naofumi Takehara — 1 record
  • Annetine Gelijns — 1 record
  • Pierre Fabre Medicament — 1 record

Representative registered studies

Recruiting studies first, then the most advanced phases. Each identifier links to the registry record, where eligibility criteria, outcome measures and contacts are published.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT03394365 — A Phase 3 Study of Tabelecleucel for Participants With Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease After Failure With RiPhase 3Recruiting115Pierre Fabre Medicament2017-12-29
NCT03145402 — ICMNC-HF. IntraCoronary Bone Marrow MonoNuclear Cells in Heart Failure (HF) PatientsPhase 1, Phase 2Unknown5SCARM Institute, Tabriz, Iran2020-10-20
NCT02439541 — Human Umbilical-Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Ischemic CardiomyopathyPhase 1, Phase 2Unknown40Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences2015-05
NCT02362646 — Safety & Efficacy of Intramyocardial Injection of Mesenchymal Precursor Cells on Myocardial Function in LVAD RecipientsPhase 2Completed159Annetine Gelijns2015-07
NCT01758406 — Transplantation of Autologous Cardiac Stem Cells in Ischemic Heart FailurePhase 2Unknown50Royan Institute2013-12
NCT01392625 — PercutaneOus StEm Cell Injection Delivery Effects On Neomyogenesis in Dilated CardioMyopathy (The POSEIDON-DCM Study)Phase 1, Phase 2Completed37Joshua M Hare2011-05-19
NCT00383630 — Bone Marrow Cell Transplantation to Improve Heart Function in Individuals With End-Stage Heart FailurePhase 2Terminated1Columbia University2007-09
NCT00418418 — Combined CABG and Stem-Cell Transplantation for Heart FailurePhase 2Unknown60University of Helsinki2006-10
NCT00629018 — Safety and Efficacy Study of Stem Cell Transplantation to Treat Dilated CardiomyopathyPhase 2Completed110University Medical Centre Ljubljana2006-05
NCT02962661 — Donor Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Controlling Heart Failure in Patients With Cardiomyopathy Caused by AnthracyclinesPhase 1Suspended72M.D. Anderson Cancer Center2020-07-18

What this page does and does not tell you

Registration counts measure activity, not effect. A study appears here the moment it is registered — before any participant is enrolled, and regardless of whether results are ever posted.

If a clinic offers you this today, the useful question is not "is there research?" but "which of these registered studies is mine part of, and if none, what evidence applies to the exact product I am being sold?" The Provider Question Builder turns that into a scored checklist.

Frequently asked

How many HSCT studies for Heart Failure & Cardiac Repair are recruiting right now?

1 of 13 registered records were listed as recruiting in the 2026-08-29 snapshot. Recruitment status changes frequently; the registry record is authoritative.

Is HSCT an approved treatment for Heart Failure & Cardiac Repair?

Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov is not approval. Approval is granted by a regulator for a specific product and indication after review of submitted evidence. 13 registered studies tell you research exists, not that a product cleared review.

How advanced is the research on HSCT for Heart Failure & Cardiac Repair?

1 of 13 records carry a Phase 3 or Phase 4 label and 6 are marked completed. Registrations run from 2006 to 2020.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.