Registry evidence

Stroke Recovery and Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC): what the trial registry contains

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry holds 45 records for MSC in Stroke Recovery: 7 recruiting now, 3 labelled Phase 3 or 4, across 14 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Why this is studied in Stroke Recovery

After ischaemic stroke, some recovery happens spontaneously through oedema resolution and cortical reorganisation, mostly in the first three to six months. Cell therapy is studied both acutely for neuroprotection and chronically for plasticity support — and that spontaneous recovery window is the reason early uncontrolled results in this indication are so often misleading.

What MSC means in this table

Mesenchymal stromal cells are the workhorse of commercial cell therapy: easy to source from fat, cord or marrow, easy to expand, and rarely characterised in the same way twice. Their proposed action is paracrine — signalling molecules that damp inflammation — rather than replacement of lost tissue. That matters when reading counts like these, because two studies filed under the same label can test materially different products at different doses by different routes.

The numbers

Every figure below comes from one reproducible query (stroke x mesenchymal stem cell) run against ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 on 2026-08-29.

MetricValue
Registered studies (all statuses)45
Interventional studies in the sample43
Recruiting right now7
Completed11
Terminated, withdrawn or suspended6
Phase 3 or Phase 4 records3
Countries with at least one site14
Median planned enrolment30 participants
Largest single planned enrolment156 participants
First / most recent start year2010 — 2026

How mature is this evidence?

The ladder is partly climbed: 3 confirmatory-phase records against 45 in total, with the remainder concentrated in dose-finding and safety territory.

The delivery record matters as much as the count: 11 completed against 6 abandoned or suspended, or 13% of everything registered.

Phase labelRecordsShare
Phase 13047%
Phase 22844%
Not applicable35%
Phase 335%

Median planned enrolment is 30 participants (largest single study: 156). Trials of this size can describe safety and generate hypotheses; detecting a modest clinical benefit reliably usually needs substantially larger numbers with a control group.

Where the studies are

Across 14 countries with registered sites, China dominates at roughly 45% — a concentration driven by funding and regulation rather than by clinical outcome.

CountryStudies with a site there
China18
United States6
South Korea3
Malaysia3
Spain2
Taiwan2
Indonesia2
France2
Netherlands1
Japan1

Legal pathway differs by country — see where cell therapy is legal, by country.

Who runs them

Among the top lead sponsors, 8 are universities or hospitals and 4 are companies, making this a academic area.

  • Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz — 2 records
  • Zhujiang Hospital — 2 records
  • Shanghai IxCell Biotechnology Co., LTD — 2 records
  • Southern Medical University, China — 2 records
  • Sclnow Biotechnology Co., Ltd. — 2 records
  • University Hospital, Grenoble — 2 records

Representative registered studies

Recruiting studies first, then the most advanced phases. Each identifier links to the registry record, where eligibility criteria, outcome measures and contacts are published.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT06129175 — UCMSCs as Treatment for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke (Stroke Neuroncell-EX)Phase 2, Phase 3Recruiting80Cytopeutics Sdn. Bhd.2023-12-19
NCT07635758 — Human Placenta-derived 3D Mesenchymal Stem Cells(Guojianqingke)Phase 1, Phase 2Recruiting24Chinese PLA General Hospital2026-06-01
NCT07084012 — A Phase IIa Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Infusion of hUC-MSCs in Patients With AISPhase 2Recruiting60Shenzhen Wingor Biotechnology Co., Ltd.2025-08-27
NCT06752720 — Intracerebral Autologous Stem Cell Therapy for Chronic Stroke PatientsPhase 2Recruiting8Hokkaido University Hospital2024-12-01
NCT06995625 — The STem Cell-derived Extracellular Vesicle Therapy In Acute Ischemic Stroke (STEVIA)Phase 1Recruiting18S&Ebio Co. Ltd.2026-06-22
NCT05158101 — Safety of Cultured Allogeneic Adult Umbilical Cord Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosome Intranasal Instillations for StrokePhase 1Recruiting15The Foundation for Orthopaedics and Regenerative Medicine2022-02-01
NCT07731087 — MSC Secretome Therapy for Cognitive Recovery After Subacute Ischemic Stroken/aRecruiting70Jumraini Tammasse2026-07-09
NCT05008588 — Combination of Conditioned Medium and Umbilical Cord-Mesenchymal Stem Cells Therapy for Acute Stroke InfarctPhase 1, Phase 2Active Not Recruiting15PT. Prodia Stem Cell Indonesia2022-05-30
NCT04434768 — Evaluate the Safety and Explore Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Acute Ischemic StrokePhase 1Active Not Recruiting10Ever Supreme Bio Technology Co., Ltd.2020-12-02
NCT02849613 — Regenerative Stem Cell Therapy for Stroke in EuropePhase 2, Phase 3Withdrawnn/aUniversity Hospital, Grenoble2016-03

What this page does and does not tell you

A registry is a plan repository. Counting entries tells you what people intended to study, which is a weaker thing than what they found.

If a clinic offers you this today, the useful question is not "is there research?" but "which of these registered studies is mine part of, and if none, what evidence applies to the exact product I am being sold?" The Provider Question Builder turns that into a scored checklist.

Frequently asked

How many MSC studies for Stroke Recovery are recruiting right now?

7 of 45 registered records were listed as recruiting in the 2026-08-29 snapshot. Recruitment status changes frequently; the registry record is authoritative.

Is MSC an approved treatment for Stroke Recovery?

Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov is not approval. Approval is granted by a regulator for a specific product and indication after review of submitted evidence. 45 registered studies tell you research exists, not that a product cleared review.

How advanced is the research on MSC for Stroke Recovery?

3 of 45 records carry a Phase 3 or Phase 4 label and 11 are marked completed. Registrations run from 2010 to 2026.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.