Registry evidence

Diabetes (Type 1 & 2) and Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC): what the trial registry contains

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry holds 29 records for MSC in Diabetes (Type 1 & 2): 1 recruiting now, 3 labelled Phase 3 or 4, across 11 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Why this is studied in Diabetes (Type 1 & 2)

The registry entries here are dominated by type 1 diabetes, an autoimmune destruction of beta cells. Two distinct strategies appear: immune reset around new-onset disease, and beta-cell replacement from stem-cell-derived islets. The second is the most genuinely transformative line of work in the whole field, and it is also the one most often invoked by clinics offering something entirely different.

What MSC means in this table

Mesenchymal stromal cells are the workhorse of commercial cell therapy: easy to source from fat, cord or marrow, easy to expand, and rarely characterised in the same way twice. Their proposed action is paracrine — signalling molecules that damp inflammation — rather than replacement of lost tissue. That matters when reading counts like these, because two studies filed under the same label can test materially different products at different doses by different routes.

The numbers

Every figure below comes from one reproducible query (type 1 diabetes x mesenchymal stem cell) run against ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 on 2026-08-29.

MetricValue
Registered studies (all statuses)29
Interventional studies in the sample29
Recruiting right now1
Completed7
Terminated, withdrawn or suspended3
Phase 3 or Phase 4 records3
Countries with at least one site11
Median planned enrolment20 participants
Largest single planned enrolment80 participants
First / most recent start year2008 — 2025

How mature is this evidence?

The ladder is partly climbed: 3 confirmatory-phase records against 29 in total, with the remainder concentrated in dose-finding and safety territory.

3 of these records (10%) were terminated, withdrawn or suspended, against 7 marked completed; unfinished studies rarely appear in marketing summaries.

Phase labelRecordsShare
Phase 11946%
Phase 21639%
Phase 337%
Not applicable37%

Median planned enrolment is 20 participants (largest single study: 80). Trials of this size can describe safety and generate hypotheses; detecting a modest clinical benefit reliably usually needs substantially larger numbers with a control group.

Where the studies are

Across 11 countries with registered sites, China dominates at roughly 37% — a concentration driven by funding and regulation rather than by clinical outcome.

CountryStudies with a site there
China10
United States4
Sweden3
Egypt2
Vietnam2
Brazil2
Iran1
Jordan1
Israel1
Belarus1

Legal pathway differs by country — see where cell therapy is legal, by country.

Who runs them

Sponsorship leans academic: 7 of the most frequent lead sponsors read as academic or hospital entities and 1 as companies. Who pays shapes what gets measured and what gets published.

  • Uppsala University Hospital — 2 records
  • Fuzhou General Hospital — 2 records
  • Ain Shams University — 1 record
  • Central Hospital, Nancy, France — 1 record
  • Shanghai Changzheng Hospital — 1 record
  • Lu Debin — 1 record

Representative registered studies

Recruiting studies first, then the most advanced phases. Each identifier links to the registry record, where eligibility criteria, outcome measures and contacts are published.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT06951074 — Insulin Producing Stem Cell Transplantation Clinical Trial in Type 1 DiabetesPhase 2, Phase 3Recruiting20Ain Shams University2025-04-01
NCT04061746 — Cellular Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes Using Mesenchymal Stem CellsPhase 1Active Not Recruiting60Medical University of South Carolina2020-02-27
NCT02138331 — Effect of Microvesicles and Exosomes Therapy on β-cell Mass in Type I Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM)Phase 2, Phase 3Unknown20General Committee of Teaching Hospitals and Institutes, Egyp2014-04
NCT01157403 — Autologous Transplantation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treatment of Patients With Onset of Type 1 DiabetesPhase 2, Phase 3Unknown80Lu Debin2010-07
NCT05207995 — The Treatment of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus With Autologous Tolerogenic Dendritic CellsPhase 1, Phase 2Completed32Institute of Biophysics and Cell Engineering of National Aca2022-03-01
NCT03973827 — Wharton´s Jelly Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Repeated Treatment of Adult Patients Diagnosed with Type I DiabetesPhase 1, Phase 2Completed15NextCell Pharma Ab2019-05-17
NCT03484741 — Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus PatientsPhase 1, Phase 2Unknown15Van Hanh General Hospital2017-04-01
NCT04078308 — Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed Type-1 Diabetes PatientsPhase 1, Phase 2Unknown20Royan Institute2015-07-06
NCT02057211 — Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Intervene in the Development of Type 1 Diabetes: a Blinded Randomized StudyPhase 2Terminated10Uppsala University Hospital2014-04
NCT01496339 — Human Menstrual Blood-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplantation in Treating Type 1 Diabetic PatientsPhase 1, Phase 2Unknown50S-Evans Biosciences Co., Ltd.2012-01

What this page does and does not tell you

A registry is a plan repository. Counting entries tells you what people intended to study, which is a weaker thing than what they found.

If a clinic offers you this today, the useful question is not "is there research?" but "which of these registered studies is mine part of, and if none, what evidence applies to the exact product I am being sold?" The Provider Question Builder turns that into a scored checklist.

Frequently asked

How many MSC studies for Diabetes (Type 1 & 2) are recruiting right now?

1 of 29 registered records were listed as recruiting in the 2026-08-29 snapshot. Recruitment status changes frequently; the registry record is authoritative.

Is MSC an approved treatment for Diabetes (Type 1 & 2)?

Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov is not approval. Approval is granted by a regulator for a specific product and indication after review of submitted evidence. 29 registered studies tell you research exists, not that a product cleared review.

How advanced is the research on MSC for Diabetes (Type 1 & 2)?

3 of 29 records carry a Phase 3 or Phase 4 label and 7 are marked completed. Registrations run from 2008 to 2025.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.