Registry evidence

Peripheral Neuropathy and Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC): what the trial registry contains

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry holds 18 records for MSC in Peripheral Neuropathy: 5 recruiting now, 0 labelled Phase 3 or 4, across 6 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Why this is studied in Peripheral Neuropathy

Peripheral neuropathy covers diabetic, chemotherapy-induced and idiopathic nerve damage with very different prognoses. Cell rationales target microvascular support and nerve regeneration, and unlike the central nervous system, peripheral nerves do regenerate — slowly, and only if the underlying cause is controlled.

What MSC means in this table

Mesenchymal stromal cells are the workhorse of commercial cell therapy: easy to source from fat, cord or marrow, easy to expand, and rarely characterised in the same way twice. Their proposed action is paracrine — signalling molecules that damp inflammation — rather than replacement of lost tissue. That matters when reading counts like these, because two studies filed under the same label can test materially different products at different doses by different routes.

The numbers

Every figure below comes from one reproducible query (peripheral neuropathy x mesenchymal stem cell) run against ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 on 2026-08-29.

MetricValue
Registered studies (all statuses)18
Interventional studies in the sample16
Recruiting right now5
Completed5
Terminated, withdrawn or suspended0
Phase 3 or Phase 4 records0
Countries with at least one site6
Median planned enrolment30 participants
Largest single planned enrolment5,000 participants
First / most recent start year2005 — 2025

How mature is this evidence?

Nothing here carries a Phase 3 label yet, but the area is live: 5 of the 18 registered studies are enrolling now, so the picture will change over the next few years.

0 of these records (0%) were terminated, withdrawn or suspended, against 5 marked completed; unfinished studies rarely appear in marketing summaries.

Phase labelRecordsShare
Phase 11045%
Phase 2627%
Not applicable523%
Early Phase 115%

Median planned enrolment is 30 participants (largest single study: 5,000). Trials of this size can describe safety and generate hypotheses; detecting a modest clinical benefit reliably usually needs substantially larger numbers with a control group.

Where the studies are

Sites are spread across 6 countries, with China accounting for roughly 35% of country mentions — geography reflects where regulators permit this work and where sponsors sit, not where care is best.

CountryStudies with a site there
China6
South Korea4
United States3
Indonesia2
Antigua and Barbuda1
Germany1

Legal pathway differs by country — see where cell therapy is legal, by country.

Who runs them

Among the top lead sponsors, 5 are universities or hospitals and 5 are companies, making this a evenly split area.

  • Jie Shen — 3 records
  • Hope Biosciences Research Foundation — 2 records
  • ENCell — 2 records
  • The Foundation for Orthopaedics and Regenerative Medicine — 1 record
  • Ruhr University of Bochum — 1 record
  • Cairo University — 1 record

Representative registered studies

Recruiting studies first, then the most advanced phases. Each identifier links to the registry record, where eligibility criteria, outcome measures and contacts are published.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT07183761 — A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Diabetic Phase 2Recruiting140Min Long2025-10-01
NCT06328712 — Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of EN001 in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A(CMT1A) (Phase 1b: Open-label, Dose-escalation, Single-cPhase 1, Phase 2Recruiting27ENCell2024-05-30
NCT04684602 — Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Various Chronic and Acute ConditionsPhase 1, Phase 2Recruiting5,000Thomas Advanced Medical LLC2020-07-09
NCT05152368 — Safety of Cultured Allogeneic Adult Umbilical Cord Stem Cells Exosomes for Trigeminal NeuralgiaPhase 1Recruiting20The Foundation for Orthopaedics and Regenerative Medicine2022-09-09
NCT07723313 — Effectiveness of Amniotic Membrane Combined With Secretome as an Adjunct to Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: Evaluation Using the Boston Carpal Tunnel QEarly Phase 1Recruiting30PT. Prodia Stem Cell Indonesia2025-12-15
NCT05507697 — Treatment With Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Refractory Diabetic Peripheral NeuropathyPhase 1, Phase 2Unknown42Wuhan Central Hospital2022-05-19
NCT01216865 — Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Injection for Diabetic FootPhase 1, Phase 2Unknown50Qingdao University2011-01
NCT01065337 — Induced Wound Healing by Application of Expanded Bone Marrow Stem Cells in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb IschemiaPhase 2Completed30Ruhr University of Bochum2005-08
NCT05947578 — The Safety and Tolerability of CLZ-2002 in Patients With Charcot-Marie Tooth Disease.Phase 1Completed9Cellatoz Therapeutics, Inc2023-06-19
NCT05333406 — Determine the Safety and Dose of EN001 in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease (CMT) Type 1APhase 1Completed9ENCell2022-02-22

What this page does and does not tell you

A registry is a plan repository. Counting entries tells you what people intended to study, which is a weaker thing than what they found.

If a clinic offers you this today, the useful question is not "is there research?" but "which of these registered studies is mine part of, and if none, what evidence applies to the exact product I am being sold?" The Provider Question Builder turns that into a scored checklist.

Frequently asked

How many MSC studies for Peripheral Neuropathy are recruiting right now?

5 of 18 registered records were listed as recruiting in the 2026-08-29 snapshot. Recruitment status changes frequently; the registry record is authoritative.

Is MSC an approved treatment for Peripheral Neuropathy?

Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov is not approval. Approval is granted by a regulator for a specific product and indication after review of submitted evidence. 18 registered studies tell you research exists, not that a product cleared review.

How advanced is the research on MSC for Peripheral Neuropathy?

0 of 18 records carry a Phase 3 or Phase 4 label and 5 are marked completed. Registrations run from 2005 to 2025.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.