Registry evidence

Peripheral Neuropathy and Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): what the trial registry contains

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry holds 24 records for PRP in Peripheral Neuropathy: 1 recruiting now, 4 labelled Phase 3 or 4, across 5 countries. Snapshot 2026-08-29.

Medical review statusMedically reviewedReviewed by: Stem Plus medical teamReviewed on: 2026-08-29Last evidence update: 2026-08-29Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Why this is studied in Peripheral Neuropathy

Peripheral neuropathy covers diabetic, chemotherapy-induced and idiopathic nerve damage with very different prognoses. Cell rationales target microvascular support and nerve regeneration, and unlike the central nervous system, peripheral nerves do regenerate — slowly, and only if the underlying cause is controlled.

What PRP means in this table

Platelet-rich plasma is a blood product, not a stem-cell product, though it is routinely sold as part of the same package. Preparation varies enormously between systems — platelet concentration, leukocyte content and activation all differ — so the label describes a category of procedure rather than a defined substance, which is the main reason its trial literature is so inconsistent.

The numbers

Every figure below comes from one reproducible query (peripheral neuropathy x platelet-rich plasma) run against ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 on 2026-08-29.

MetricValue
Registered studies (all statuses)24
Interventional studies in the sample23
Recruiting right now1
Completed13
Terminated, withdrawn or suspended1
Phase 3 or Phase 4 records4
Countries with at least one site5
Median planned enrolment60 participants
Largest single planned enrolment90 participants
First / most recent start year2012 — 2025

How mature is this evidence?

The ladder is partly climbed: 4 confirmatory-phase records against 24 in total, with the remainder concentrated in dose-finding and safety territory.

Registrations do not all survive contact with recruitment — 13 completed here, 1 stopped early, giving a 4% attrition rate.

Phase labelRecordsShare
Not applicable1664%
Phase 1312%
Phase 328%
Phase 428%
Phase 228%

Median planned enrolment is 60 participants (largest single study: 90). Trials of this size can describe safety and generate hypotheses; detecting a modest clinical benefit reliably usually needs substantially larger numbers with a control group.

Where the studies are

Across 5 countries with registered sites, Egypt dominates at roughly 52% — a concentration driven by funding and regulation rather than by clinical outcome.

CountryStudies with a site there
Egypt11
Taiwan6
Turkey (Türkiye)2
Spain1
United States1

Legal pathway differs by country — see where cell therapy is legal, by country.

Who runs them

The sponsor mix is academic (11 academic or hospital, 1 commercial among the most frequent lead sponsors).

  • Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH) — 5 records
  • Assiut University — 3 records
  • Taipei Medical University Hospital — 1 record
  • Dalia Salah Saif — 1 record
  • Baskent University — 1 record
  • Saint Bernard Mission University — 1 record

Representative registered studies

Recruiting studies first, then the most advanced phases. Each identifier links to the registry record, where eligibility criteria, outcome measures and contacts are published.

StudyPhaseStatusPlanned nLead sponsorStart
NCT07565844 — Intradermal Exosomes, Platelet-Rich Plasma, and Steroids for Post-Herpetic Neuralgian/aRecruiting45Zagazig University2025-02-02
NCT06249503 — Ultrasound Guided Activated and Non Activated Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Versus Hydro Dissection by Steroids.Phase 4Completed90Ain Shams University2023-02-01
NCT06209957 — Study of Single Platelet-Rich Plasma Local Injection Vs. Single Corticosteroid Local Injection in Carpal Tunnel SyndromePhase 4Completed40Menoufia University2017-06-01
NCT04434105 — Ultrasound-guided PRP Versus Steroid Injections in Management of Carpal Tunnel SyndromePhase 2, Phase 3Unknown90Tanta University2020-02-01
NCT04000932 — Platelet Rich Plasma in Carpal Tunnel SyndromePhase 3Unknown84Baskent University2018-07-15
NCT05348408 — Efficacy of Peri-neural Platelet Rich Plasma Injection in Treatment of Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral NeuropathyPhase 2Completed62South Egypt Cancer Institute2022-04-01
NCT04235426 — Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Versus Surgical and Medical Treatment of Mild-moderate Carpel Tunnel Syndrome.Phase 1Unknown90Dalia Salah Saif2018-01-26
NCT05053477 — Radiofrequency, Perineural Injection, Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel SyndromePhase 1Unknown75Alexandria University2018-09-01
NCT02993809 — Autologous Transplantation of BM-ECs With Platelet-Rich Plasma Extract for the Treatment of Critical Limb IschemiaPhase 1Unknown40South China Research Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative M2018-03
NCT06638008 — Ultrasound Guided Placental Growth Factor Vs Platelet Rich Plasma Injection in Peripheral Nerve Injury: an Interventional Studyn/aNot Yet Recruiting75Assiut University2025-01-15

What this page does and does not tell you

A registry is a plan repository. Counting entries tells you what people intended to study, which is a weaker thing than what they found.

If a clinic offers you this today, the useful question is not "is there research?" but "which of these registered studies is mine part of, and if none, what evidence applies to the exact product I am being sold?" The Provider Question Builder turns that into a scored checklist.

Frequently asked

How many PRP studies for Peripheral Neuropathy are recruiting right now?

1 of 24 registered records were listed as recruiting in the 2026-08-29 snapshot. Recruitment status changes frequently; the registry record is authoritative.

Is PRP an approved treatment for Peripheral Neuropathy?

Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov is not approval. Approval is granted by a regulator for a specific product and indication after review of submitted evidence. 24 registered studies tell you research exists, not that a product cleared review.

How advanced is the research on PRP for Peripheral Neuropathy?

4 of 24 records carry a Phase 3 or Phase 4 label and 13 are marked completed. Registrations run from 2012 to 2025.

Registry and literature counts retrieved 2026-08-29 (ClinicalTrials.gov API v2; PubMed E-utilities). Registration or publication volume measures research activity, not effectiveness or approval. Educational information — not medical advice; verify product, indication, legal pathway and evidence with an independent qualified physician. Page generated 2026-08-29. See our editorial standards.

Explore all sections · Data & downloads

Download the query data

Download CSV · Download JSON

Query totals are full API matches; status, phase and country counts describe the first up to 400 returned records per query. Query classes overlap and must not be summed as unique trials. Counts are not treatment outcomes. Snapshot: 2026-08-29. Methods and field definitions.