Immunologic

Primary Immunodeficiency: cell-therapy evidence and registered trials

A source-first research page for the exact condition. It does not recommend a cell product, clinic or private treatment.

Medical review statusPending clinical sign-offLast evidence update: 2026-08-05Methodology and editorial standards
Clinical review team: Dr Kamelia Milcheva, Hematologist · Dr Vadym Uvarov, Board-Certified Physician · Hepatobiliary Surgeon · Candidate of Medical SciencesEditorial responsibility: StemCellAtlas research teamEducational information only. This page does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or a treatment recommendation.

Registry snapshot

ClinicalTrials.gov returned 92 registered studies for the stored condition/intervention query, including 13 recruiting records, retrieved 2026-08-05T06:02:03+00:00. A registry count does not establish efficacy, approval, relevance or eligibility; inspect each study's design, product, status and inclusion criteria.

Research activity over time

Registration of new studies slowed: 10 newly registered studies in 2021–2025 against 24 in 2016–2020. The first study in this registry query was posted in 1999; the registry now holds 92 in total, of which 13 are recruiting. Counting is by first-posted date, so the series reflects when research was registered — not enrolment, completion or results.

Newly registered Primary Immunodeficiency studies by year
20162
20176
20186
20193
20207
20212
20222
20242
20254
20261

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2, retrieved 2026-08-05. A registration count is not evidence of efficacy, approval or eligibility. Open the exact query ↗

What the trial registry actually shows

Our own count of every study registered on ClinicalTrials.gov for primary immunodeficiency with a stem-cell intervention, retrieved 2026-09-05. A registration is a declaration of intent, not a result — which is why the status column matters more than the total.

Status in the registryStudiesShare
Completed3538%
Active, closed to entry1415%
Terminated early1213%
Recruiting now1213%
Status not updated by sponsor910%
Withdrawn before enrolling44%
Enrolling by invitation only33%
Not yet recruiting22%
Expanded access11%
Suspended11%
All registered studies93100%

Reading it: 17 stopped before finishing — terminated, withdrawn or suspended, 18% of the total; 21 carry no assigned trial phase, meaning they sit outside the phased development path that leads to an approved medicine; 33 reached Phase 2 or later, against 39 still at Phase 1 or earlier; 9 have had no status update from the sponsor and may be dormant.

Counts are our own extraction from the ClinicalTrials.gov API, retrieved 2026-09-05. The query behind them is published with the dataset so anyone can repeat the count. Nothing here is evidence of benefit or a treatment recommendation.

What to verify before interpreting a study or offer

  1. The exact product, cell source, processing, dose and delivery route.
  2. The indication, study phase, comparator, endpoints, status and eligibility criteria.
  3. Whether the proposed use is authorised, part of a registered trial or otherwise investigational.
  4. Provider and manufacturing authorisations, release testing, traceability and adverse-event reporting.
  5. How the proposal compares with current standard care, reviewed by an independent physician.

Sources & further reading

Registry data is a discovery aid, not evidence that a treatment works or is suitable for an individual patient.

Compare cell-therapy evidence, registered studies and published price observations.

StemCellAtlas is a source-first research and cost-planning guide. It separates registry and regulator evidence from heterogeneous commercial observations.

Request written information